In a landmark move, the Supreme Court of India has issued an ultimatum to the Centre regarding the induction of women into the Coast Guard. The court expressed its dissatisfaction with what it termed a “patriarchal” mindset opposing the grant of permanent commission to women officers. The case, brought forward by a woman officer of the Coast Guard, Priyanka Tyagi, highlights the struggle for gender equality in the armed forces.
What Is the Ultimatum?
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, heading a three-judge bench, delivered a clear ultimatum to the Centre, stating, “Women cannot be left out. If you do not do it, we will do it.” The court emphasized that arguments based on functionality and operational differences do not hold weight in the contemporary landscape of 2024.
The Attorney General, R Venkataramani, assured that he would request the Coast Guard to submit an affidavit in response.
Priyanka Tyagi Case Background & Previous Hearings:
Priyanka Tyagi’s petition seeks a permanent commission for eligible women officers joining the Coast Guard under a short-service commission. The Attorney General, during the previous hearing on February 19, faced the court’s rebuke for an apparent “indifference” towards the Coast Guard and a reluctance to integrate women into the force.
The Chief Justice questioned why there was a patriarchal approach and insisted on the need to align with the principles of “Nari Shakti” (woman power).
The court has consistently challenged the notion of functional differences, citing the precedent set by judgments allowing permanent commissions for women in the Army and Navy. The February 2020 ruling paved the way for women short service commission officers to be eligible for permanent commission in non-combat streams of the Army and Air Force.
Government’s Response:
The Attorney General argued that the Coast Guard differs functionally from the Navy and Army, emphasizing the need for structural changes. He highlighted the formation of a board in November 2023 to consider these changes. However, the court, dismissing the functional differences argument, made it clear that such justifications are outdated.
Gender Equality:
The Supreme Court has set March 1 as the date for the next hearing, signaling its intent to address the issue promptly. As the court takes a strong stance on gender equality, the case has wider implications for breaking down barriers and fostering inclusivity within India’s armed forces. The emphasis on a fair and gender-neutral policy reflects a broader commitment to advancing the principles of equality and empowerment.
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s warning serves as a powerful assertion of the principles of equality and non-discrimination. It underscores the importance of recognizing and rectifying gender biases within institutions, particularly in sectors as crucial as the armed forces. The case is not just about a one-woman officer but symbolizes a larger movement towards inclusivity, challenging outdated norms, and promoting a more equitable society.
Before You Go, Make Sure You Follow Our Newsletter For More Interesting Articles